On April 14, a group of extremist militants drove off into Nigeria's
remote Sambisa forest. With them were 270 young girls, students from a
secondary school in the town of Chibok who had been there to complete
their final exam when the gunmen forced them into their trucks.
Nearly a month later, a majority of the girls remain in captivity. Boko Haram's infamous leader Abubaker Shekau has claimed responsibility for the abductions
and threatened to sell the girls in the market place. While both the
Nigerian army and police are looking for the students, their exact
location remains unclear, leading to one startling question: Why has it
been so difficult for Nigeria's security forces to locate the missing
girls?
Exemplifying the frustration with the armed forces is a report released by Amnesty International on Friday
that details how senior military officers in the school's region had
advanced knowledge of an impending Boko Haram attack but failed to act. Read more after the cut....
According
to Amnesty, military commands in the towns of Damboa and Maiduguri
received repeated warnings from local officials and security forces
about the upcoming attack in Chibok, but did not send troops to
reinforce the 17 army personnel and police officers stationed in the
small town. A senior officer in the Nigerian military told the
organization that the commander had been unable to organize
reinforcements because of a lack of equipment and a fear among the
soldiers to confront the militants. "There’s a lot of frustration,
exhaustion and fatigue among officers and [troops] based in the hotspots
… many soldiers are afraid to go to the battle fronts,” the officer
said.
Nigerian soldiers interviewed by Reuters echoed those frustrations,
complaining about bad food, rough sleeping conditions, conflicts over
leave and a constant fear of Boko Haram attacks. "The Nigerian military
is a shadow of what it's reputed to have once been," James Hall, a
retired colonel and former British military attaché to Nigeria, told the
news service. "They've fallen apart."
But how did a military that was once considered one of the strongest in Africa get to this point of apparent exhaustion?
As Michael Pizzi explains in Al Jazeera,
a seemingly infinite number of military coups caused a deep distrust
between the government and the army, prompting authorities to
significantly cut the military's size in the past 15 years. While it
still has a significant budget, Nigeria currently has the lowest ratio
of military personnel to population in the world.
The troops that are in service were not prepared for the Boko Haram campaign, the International Crisis Group notes.
Nigeria's security forces had traditionally primarily been trained to
protect the country's head of state and institutions, rather than
fighting insurgents in remote corners of the nation. While the
government has started to put greater emphasis on urban warfare,
counterterrorism and counterinsurgency training, as well as appropriate
equipment for the troops, the security agencies remain ill-prepared for
the current challenges.
Reuters notes that the militants seem
well aware of this incongruity. When Boko Haram extremists attacked the
town of Gamboru Ngala on May 7, for example, a military jet flew over
the market but failed to derail the attack -- the insurgents knew the
pilot would never bomb a densely populated area. As many as 300 people were slaughtered in the assault on the border town.
In
addition to the lack of proper training, analysts say that while
Nigeria's military budget is massive, much of the resources never make
it to the troops, instead filling the pockets of government officials,
senior officers and businessmen. Soldiers appear to lack sufficient
training for the equipment they do have, and poor maintenance reduces
the effectiveness of the nation's arsenal. “In the past three years,
defense has been grabbing the greatest amount in terms of appropriation
and there is very little to show for it,” University of Abuja lecturer Abubakar Umar Kari told the Christian Science Monitor.
Lastly,
Nigeria hasn't only been criticized for its lack of military action
against Boko Haram; some of the counterterrorism operations that
security forces have conducted have also drawn equal condemnation. While
Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan gave the military more powers in
its fight against the insurgents by declaring a state of emergency in
the northeastern Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states, foreign governments and
international organizations have accused troops of indiscriminate use of force and extrajudicial killings.
Amnesty International said security forces massacred 622 people
in response to a Boko Haram attack in March 2014. After a group of Boko
Haram insurgents attacked Giwa barracks in the city of Maiduguri,
freeing prisoners who were being held as suspected Boko Haram members,
troops allegedly killed hundreds of the unarmed detainees.
The accusations of indiscriminate killings have prompted some Western militaries to cut training and support. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in May 2013 the
U.S. was "deeply concerned by credible allegations that Nigerian
security forces are committing gross human rights violations, which, in
turn, only escalate the violence and fuel extremism."
As Teju Cole points out, one year later, the U.S. State Department has reversed its position.
"The kidnapping of hundreds of children by Boko Haram is an unconscionable crime," Kerry said
in a May speech in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa. "We will do
everything possible to support the Nigerian government to return these
young women to their homes and hold the perpetrators to justice. That is
our responsibility and the world's responsibility."
SOURCE: Huffpost